Tuesday, 22 May 2012

Evaluation - Evaluating FeedBack

What worked really well with your demo/ presentation? Is there any areas that you scored consistently high marks?

Overall the feedback was fairly cut down the middle,  there was a consistent amount of compliments on one half but on the other half there were some improvements to be made which is fair as you cant expect everyone to like it.

All though i agree with some of the improvements, some of it seamed biased and this could of been because of a problem that has been going on with said individuals for a while and they don't seam to have a good opinion to anything that me and the other member in my group do.

Some of the comments made do seam completely unfair and out of the blue such as: "the logo/jingle have nothing to do with the station" When you can clearly see that they do, there is a pules line in the logo and a heartbeat in the jingle, as the station is called pulse FM. There were also comments to do with the music being to main stream. The station is a CHR one that we aimed to be similar to capital FM and it is stated in what our target audience wants and one them is main stream music.

The good points though,  focused on the clarity of some parts of the audio, the professionalism of the logo and jingle also the up-beatness of the music.


What do your questionnaires tell you that you could have done better?

The main point was across it all was about the volume of the music in the news bed. It was requested that it was made a bit louder. Apart from that there were no other real improvements requested.




No comments:

Post a Comment